I remember clearly when I heard the aphorism “hinduism is not a religion, it is a way of life”. I worked in India at that time and was visiting Chicago to meet a client. I am not sure how the conversation veered towards religion. Probably, from vegetarianism or beef on the menu and my client wondering if I was a Hindu and offended. I must have stopped for a second with my mouth almost forming an answer, considering all the nuances of born as, being or not being a Hindu and how to express it in a succinct yet not misleading way. And she helpfully offered “it is a way of life”.
Since then I have been hearing it increasingly regularly. Might be because I lived in USA for the longest time after that in metros where ‘woke’ people ‘know’ these things. I am not sure how and where this idea came up. Probably, to explain that hinduism is not like other abrahmic religions – structured, built around a holy book, and practiced as a congregation. It is a motley collection of people and practices.
I was surprised when I heard it again during a heritage walk of old Delhi. The walk facilitator was talking about how the category Hindu, referring to religion, came up as a catch all phrase for non-moslem and non-christian/european people during the British times and then took root in the social psyche and census data. Someone chimed in helpfully, “yeah, I have heard, hinduism is a way of life”.
The first time I heard that term and internalized it, I thought it was helpful. To me ‘a way of life’ signified varied ways of life, not one specific god, no particular religious book that is termed the holy book like bible, no singular religious practice that can label a person as practicing or non-practicing Hindu. It acknowledged the many formal, named darshanas (philosophical schools) and many practices not codified.
Lately, I have realized that the aphorism doesn’t really mean anything. If you asked various people labelled hindus, what are the highlights of the ‘way of life’, it would be very difficult to come up with a list that everybody agrees with. Even if we come up with a theoretical list of attributes (vegetarianism being the most touted), I am pretty sure it would not match the actual lived experiences of people. So, whose way of life are we claiming is hinduism? The term is just an easy way to sidestep all the difficult conversations and realization that there is no homogeneous mass that can be termed hindu.
